2007 August | stimulant - changing things around. . .

stimulant

changing things around. . .


things to look at (August 25th)

posted in links by Alec on August 25th, 2007 :

a few, tasty links (August 25th):

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

things to look at (August 20th - August 24th)

posted in links by Alec on August 24th, 2007 :

a few, tasty links (August 20th - August 24th):

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Google “define:”

posted in politics by Alec on August 23rd, 2007 :

Some people deny that Wikipedia has a liberal bias:
stopgap

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

“Worms” by Beth Orton

posted in Uncategorized by Alec on August 20th, 2007 :

chickens don’t fly but they have got the wings
no matter how hard they try
they bump into things
they’re all running around
like they’re heads on the ground
they got a wish bone where their backbone should’ve grown
<\blockquote>

Or: “[…] has a wishbone for a backbone.”

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

things to look at (August 12th - August 19th)

posted in links by Alec on August 19th, 2007 :

a few, tasty links (August 12th - August 19th):

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

[ac]credit[ation]

posted in edumication by Alec on August 19th, 2007 :

One thing that always strikes me as strange about discussions like this about accreditation or credit is that all of these contortions are a natural byproduct of not having students do anything important: they end up without having anything of substance to show for their work. Instead, since classes (more broadly, schools) operate on this idea of students as bins that get filled up with varying amounts of knowledge and skills, the focus is on the student themselves and trying to tease out the integrity and extent of that knowledge. I’ve never seen more persuasive or comprehensive assessment than an in-depth project that someone has completed. For all the EECS students I know, the only ones whose skills impress me are the ones who build things.

What’s particularly strange about the discussion about credit and accreditation is that

It must be remembered that one of the reasons for the establishment of accreditation by geographical regions was precisely to provide assurance to accepting institutions that the credits earned at the “sending” institution were in fact “earned and comparable.” Within regions virtually all institutions offering academic coursework were known and a network of college officials worked together to make practical and usually fair transfer decisions.

which doesn’t question at all the model under which tihs assessment is happening. It doesn’t question what’s “earned and comparable.” Even some discussions of assessment that suggest project-based or portfolio-based methods often propose that skills and knowledge should be taught traditionally, then for the purposes of assessment, students should be given a project or set of assignments to create a portfolio.

When this happened to me in high school, the experience was a ridiculous one. The teachers resented the extra work and lost class time. The students resented the lost time, the tedium, the absurdly vague and wishy-washy language of the “standards” which our “portfolios” were intended to meet. In the end, everyone acknowledged the need to bullshit our way through the work, and so we did.

One of the reasons that [ac]credit[ation] and assessment are such difficult topics is that as long as the content of a student’s learning exists without a context, investigating the efficacy of their education is unavoidably going to confound their mastery of the school system and their mastery of the material. The exciting thing about real contexts and applications of knowledge is that they are valuable manifestations of learning that exist independently of school. Something you build or write or prove or make that calls on the skills and knowledge you’ve acquired is the truest representation of the learning process because it recreates exactly the object of the learning process. Tests are not the object of the learning process. Supposedly, their comprehensiveness makes up for their failure to provide context. But a comprehensive lie is worse than a partial truth. Seymour Papert once commented

Working with Michael [a “troubled” student who was constantly at odds, failing, in the public school system] has increased for me the troubling awareness that failure in school can be the expression of valuable intellectual and personal qualities.

How can we, in good conscience, implement a system that disenfranchises people by failing to provide for the exercise of their skills and capacity in a fair context, and in turn say that that disenfranchisement is to rectify precisely the dearth of skill and capacity we misperceive because of the system we’ve rigged?

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

a quick note about note-taking

posted in sysadmin by Alec on August 15th, 2007 :

I’m back, again.

A quick note: as I read papers, books, whatever, I’ll be updating my Google Notebooks, from which I’ll probably be drawing a good number of my posts. I’ll also start adding and documenting the various notes and ideas I write throughout the day, and as I start projects, I’ll document them online. Eventually, I’ll be able to do this with my own software. But until then, Google Notebook is serviceable.

Anyway, feel free to peruse, inquire, comment as I link to them. I’m still finishing up the notebook for Instead of Education, but it’s viewable here. As it comes up, project documentation will be available here, and an archive all my marginalia will be available here.

Enjoy.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

things to look at (August 11th)

posted in links by Alec on August 11th, 2007 :

a few, tasty links (August 11th):

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

things to look at (August 3rd - August 10th)

posted in links by Alec on August 10th, 2007 :

a few, tasty links (August 3rd - August 10th):

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

cui bono?

posted in politics by Alec on August 5th, 2007 :

Taxing cigarettes is a pretty repugnant policy. The government acknowledges that cigarettes are addictive and unhealthy and then turns around and makes a profit off that? And forces that policy to do double duty as a punitive measure in the interest of public health?

The government taxes the sale of an addictive and unhealthy substance because it is addictive and unhealthy.

Cui bono? Whether or not it’s intentional malfeasance, taking advantage of an addicted [read: captive] group and alleging that punitive measures are benevolent is atrocious.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]